Asset Depletion Mortgages In Ohio — The Quick Read: Asset depletion is an underwriting method, not a loan product — it converts liquid assets into a hypothetical income figure so a lender can measure repayment ability without relying on traditional personal-income documentation or a paycheck. There’s no single federal formula; every non-QM program builds its own divisor and asset list. Ohio borrowers qualify under the same national mechanics as anywhere else, since no state law changes how assets are converted to income. This article covers the mechanics, the structures, the edge cases, and where the general rule breaks down.
Before going further, here’s a quick note on scope: this is a national explainer on how asset depletion underwriting works. Ohio doesn’t have its own asset-depletion law. The rules described here apply the same way no matter where the property sits — whether that’s Columbus or anywhere else. Lendmire’s consumer mortgage lending operates in 16 states, including Ohio. So borrowers there follow the same wholesale-network guidelines discussed below, subject to full underwriting on every file.
Key Takeaways
- Asset depletion is a method for calculating income from a balance sheet, not a separate mortgage program with its own name at every lender.
- Neither the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau nor the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency mandates a specific divisor or haircut schedule — each program sets its own.
- Assets get carved for closing costs and reserves before the income math runs, and business funds, gifts, and most trusts are excluded outright, not just discounted.
- Asset depletion tests the person on a personal repayment-capacity basis; DSCR loans test the property’s rental income — they answer different underwriting questions and shouldn’t be treated as interchangeable.
- Through select lenders in Lendmire’s wholesale network, asset-based qualification runs from $300,000 to $30,000,000, with leverage that steps down as loan size climbs.
What “Asset Depletion” Actually Means
There’s no separate federal rule that creates an “asset depletion loan.” Instead, this product exists because the federal truth-in-lending rulebook allows room for it under repayment-capacity underwriting. The federal consumer-finance regulator’s own compliance guide confirms this: lenders can weigh assets the same way they weigh income when deciding if a borrower can repay a mortgage. Income doesn’t need to come from a salary or a full-time job to count.
Bank regulators actually give a clearer technical description than consumer-protection rules do. The OCC’s 2019 bulletin on asset dissipation underwriting defines it this way: it turns a borrower’s assets into a hypothetical cash annuity stream, adds that to any other income, and uses the total to qualify the borrower. Lenders use this most often for high-net-worth applicants — people with real wealth but not enough cash flow to qualify under standard income rules. In short: asset-rich, but income-thin on paper.
Neither regulator hands lenders a formula. The bulletin only suggests it would be prudent to tie the dissipation period to a term similar to other residential loans. That silence is exactly why every non-QM lender in the market runs its own math — there’s no agency rulebook forcing consistency.
Key Terms Defined
Asset dissipation/depletion underwriting (ADU): a method that converts a borrower’s liquid assets into a hypothetical monthly income figure for qualifying purposes, rather than relying on wages or self-employment earnings.
Divisor: the number of months a lender divides an eligible asset balance by to produce that hypothetical monthly income figure — commonly a fixed period like 36, 60, or 84 months, chosen by the individual program.
Repayment-capacity (repayment-capacity): the federal standard requiring a lender to make a reasonable, good-faith determination that a borrower can repay a mortgage before extending credit.
Reserves: liquid funds a borrower must have left over after closing, held separately from any assets used to generate qualifying income.
Assets-only qualification: a structure that skips debt-to-income math entirely and instead requires liquid assets equal to the loan amount plus closing costs.
How Underwriting Actually Treats It, Step by Step
The sequence is consistent across the non-QM market even though the numbers differ program to program.
Step 1 — Inventory eligible assets. Checking, savings, money market, brokerage, and vested retirement accounts form the core pool. Real estate equity doesn’t count, and business accounts generally sit outside the income calculation even when they can help fund a down payment.
Step 2 — Apply haircuts by asset class. Cash accounts count near full value. Market-based holdings like stocks and mutual funds get discounted for volatility. Retirement accounts get discounted further to account for taxes and early-withdrawal penalties — through select lenders in Lendmire’s wholesale network, retirement balances typically count at 70%, stepping up to 80% once a borrower reaches age 59½.
Step 3 — Subtract funds already spoken for. Anything earmarked for the down payment, closing costs, or required reserves gets carved out before the income math runs. The same dollar can’t fund the closing and generate qualifying income at the same time — this is the single most common structuring mistake practitioners flag on these files.
Step 4 — Apply the divisor. The remaining eligible balance gets divided by a set number of months to produce a monthly qualifying-income figure. Through select lenders in Lendmire’s wholesale network, this typically runs on a 36-month divisor when the resulting income supplements other income and debt-to-income sits at or below 60%, a 60-month divisor when DTI runs above that, or an 84-month divisor for a standalone asset-based file or any loan above $3,500,000.
Step 5 — Run it through DTI, or skip DTI altogether. In an asset-allowance structure, the derived monthly figure blends into a standard debt-to-income calculation alongside any other income. In an assets-only structure, DTI gets skipped entirely — the borrower instead needs liquid U.S. assets equal to the loan amount, closing costs, and, if another residential property runs at a net loss, sixty months of that shortfall.
Documentation generally means several consecutive months of verified statements — no gaps, no summarized transaction histories — plus a clear paper trail on any large or recent deposit.
The Structures and Variations
Across the non-QM landscape, three structures show up repeatedly, and they’re not interchangeable.
The asset-allowance structure is the most common option. It supplements other income instead of replacing it entirely. Most self-employed or recently retired borrowers use this version when they have some documented income, but not quite enough to clear conventional debt-to-income math on its own.
The assets-only structure removes DTI from the equation. It fits a borrower with deep, verifiable liquidity but little or no reportable income at all — a business owner who just sold a company, for example, with proceeds sitting in a brokerage account.
A profit-and-loss or bank-statement path also exists, running alongside these options for self-employed borrowers. This path works well when their bank deposits tell a stronger story than their traditional income paperwork. Through select lenders in Lendmire’s wholesale network, this works two ways. First, qualifying income can come from 12 or 24 consecutive months of bank statements. Lenders then run this through a fixed expense ratio, which changes based on staffing and business type. The ratio is lower for a service business with no employees, higher for one with a small staff, and higher still for a business with more employees or any product-based business. Second, lenders can use a profit-and-loss method, capped at a set percentage of stated income. Either way, transfers from the borrower’s own business into their personal account count in full, at 100%.
Loan sizing under these programs runs from $300,000 to $30,000,000 through two separate wholesale ladders — a portfolio non-QM program carrying files to $6,000,000, and a bank portfolio program that carries twelve-month-statement files to $30,000,000 on its own scale: 65% at or below $5,000,000, 60% at or below $10,000,000, and 55% up to $30,000,000, with interest-only capped at 60% or the band’s own ceiling, whichever is lower. Leverage on a primary residence steps down as the loan gets bigger — 90% at or below $1,000,000, 85% at or below $2,000,000, 80% at or below $3,000,000, and 75% at the top credit tier through $4,000,000. Above $4,000,000, every file gets reviewed case by case before submission — never assume a flat percentage applies at that size. Second homes and investment properties run roughly five points lower at every band.
Where the General Rule Breaks: Named Edge Cases
Excluded is not the same as discounted. Some assets aren’t haircut — they’re removed from the pool entirely. Business funds, gift funds, most trust structures other than a revocable living trust, unvested stock, and cryptocurrency never count, no matter how liquid they look on a statement. No haircut percentage brings an excluded asset back into eligibility.
Age changes retirement treatment. A borrower under 59½ counts retirement funds at a lower percentage than one over that threshold, because early withdrawal triggers real tax and penalty costs that reduce spendable value.
Occupancy matters more than most borrowers expect. Asset depletion, as a personal ability-to-repay tool, is built primarily around owner-occupied purchases and, on some programs, second homes — not around financing the rental property’s own cash flow. That’s a structurally different question from a business-purpose loan, and it’s worth reading the complete DSCR loans guide to see how property-income underwriting works when the subject property itself is the collateral being tested, not the borrower’s personal balance sheet.
Double-counting is the most common mistake. Using the same account balance for both qualifying income and required post-closing reserves shows up repeatedly across practitioner files as the single most frequent structuring error. Through select lenders in Lendmire’s wholesale network, reserve requirements typically run 3 months of payments on loans at or below $500,000, 6 months at or below $1,500,000, and 9 months above that, plus 2 additional months per other financed property up to a 12-month cap — and cash-out proceeds can never satisfy that reserve requirement.
Above $4,000,000, nothing is assumed. Every file crosses that line into case-by-case review before it even goes to submission — leverage, documentation depth, and eligible-asset scope all get evaluated individually rather than pulled off a published grid.
The Investor Decision in Practice
Picture an investor who recently sold a business. They now hold roughly $2.4 million in liquid, non-retirement brokerage assets, but their reportable income on paper is modest. First, the lender sets aside money for closing costs and required reserves. Then the remaining eligible balance gets divided — either by 60 months or by 84 months. Which one depends on whether this income needs to stand alone or just supplement other income. That result becomes the monthly qualifying income used in debt-to-income math. The exact dollar amount depends entirely on the eligible balance and which divisor is used. That’s why every file gets modeled individually — you can’t just estimate it with a rule of thumb.
Now run the same investor’s situation forward: say that same person also owns a rental property whose lease doesn’t clear a lender’s minimum coverage ratio on its own. Asset depletion, in select scenarios, can supplement — not replace — the property’s income test when a rental’s cash flow falls short of a minimum coverage threshold. That’s a narrow use case, and it’s a different conversation from qualifying a purchase purely on the strength of a personal balance sheet.
The broader market context matters here too. This growth shows that asset-based and cash-flow-based qualification paths are becoming a bigger, more mainstream part of investor financing — not just a niche workaround. That’s worth knowing before you assume a conventional lender is often a strong option on the table.
Investors often juggle more than one type of financing at once. One example: a primary home bought using assets, plus a rental portfolio qualified on rental income. If you want to see how this works in other high-net-worth markets, check out the Boulder asset depletion breakdown and the Atherton asset depletion breakdown. Both explain the same national rules, just applied to different types of borrowers.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does asset depletion mean I have to sell off my portfolio to qualify?
No. The calculation is arithmetic, not a liquidation event. Assets get divided by a set number of months to produce a hypothetical income figure; the underlying holdings stay invested and don’t need to be sold to close the loan.
Is asset depletion the same thing as a DSCR loan?
No, they answer different questions. Asset depletion qualifies the borrower on a personal ability-to-repay basis, typically for an owner-occupied or second-home purchase. DSCR loans qualify the property, based on whether its rental income covers the payment, subject to lender guidelines — a business-purpose structure built for non-owner-occupied investment properties.
What credit score does asset depletion require?
Through select lenders in Lendmire’s wholesale network, the portfolio program typically carries a 660 credit floor, stepping up to 700 above the super-jumbo threshold. Exact requirements vary by loan size, occupancy, and program, subject to full underwriting.
Can I combine asset depletion with retirement account income or a pension?
In an asset-allowance structure, yes — the derived monthly figure from eligible assets typically blends into standard debt-to-income math alongside pension, Social Security, or other documented income. An assets-only structure skips DTI entirely and doesn’t need that blend.
What happens to gift funds or business account balances in this calculation?
They generally don’t count toward qualifying income at all. Business accounts, gift funds, most trust structures other than a revocable living trust, unvested stock, and cryptocurrency are excluded outright — not discounted, excluded — regardless of how much liquidity they show on paper.
If you’re weighing whether a purchase should qualify on personal assets or on a rental property’s own income, Lendmire can help you compare options based on the property’s cash flow, your asset position, credit profile, and leverage goals.
For current guidelines and terms, see Lendmire’s super jumbo bank statement loan programs page.
About Lendmire
Lendmire (NMLS# 2371349) is a mortgage brokerage built around DSCR investor lending, with programs available in 40 markets, including Washington, D.C. DSCR lenders commonly evaluate rental-income coverage instead of personal income paperwork — a practical fit for LLC-owned and multi-property investors. Terms vary by lender, property, leverage, and program. Scotsman Guide named Lendmire a Top Mortgage Workplace in both 2025 and 2026.
Get Started
Ready to find the right loan for you?
In about 30 seconds you can review financing options available for your home or investment property. No commitment required.
Informational only. Not a Loan Estimate, approval, or commitment to lend. Program availability and eligibility are subject to lender guidelines, credit approval, property review, and underwriting.
References
1. CFPB Ability-to-Repay/QM Small Entity Compliance Guide
Brandon Miller
Founder & CEO, Mortgage Loan Originator, Lendmire LLC
- Mortgage Loan Originator · NMLS# 1129696 · Verify on NMLS Consumer Access
- North Carolina Real Estate Broker · License# 343312 · Verify on NCREC
- North Carolina Insurance Producer · License# 19053198 · Property, Casualty, Life, Health · Verify on NAIC SBS
- Lendmire LLC · Firm NMLS# 2371349 · Verify firm licensure
Disclosure information. Lendmire is a state-licensed mortgage brokerage under NMLS# 2371349. Lendmire is not a depository institution, direct lender, or financial advisor — all loans referenced are placed through wholesale lender partners and are subject to each lender's underwriting standards. This article is provided for general informational purposes and is not a commitment to lend, nor does it constitute financial, legal, or tax advice. Loan programs, terms, rates, and qualification standards change without notice and depend on borrower profile, property type, and the state in which the subject property is located. Equal Housing Opportunity provider. NMLS Consumer Access: nmlsconsumeraccess.org.
