The Quick Read: A non-warrantable trigger is a building-level problem, and a bank statement loan is a borrower-level income method, so the two are reviewed separately on the same file and a strong set of deposits cannot cure a weak building. Through select wholesale programs, subject to full underwriting, leverage on a non-warrantable condo purchase tops out at 80%, and the loan-size ladder can lower it further. Luxury is not a formal category, but luxury towers carry features that trip triggers more often.
- The building is tested on its finances, insurance, ownership concentration, litigation, commercial space, repairs and use.
- The borrower is tested on 12 or 24 months of deposits after an expense ratio, plus credit, reserves and debt-to-income.
- Every loan above $4,000,000 is reviewed case by case before submission.
- The building questionnaire should be in hand before the contract is signed, not after.
Key Terms Defined
Warrantable condo: a building that meets the project standards of conventional agency-backed lenders.
Non-warrantable condo: a building that fails at least one of those standards, which closes the conventional door but not every door.
Bank statement loan: a non-QM mortgage that builds qualifying income from bank deposits instead of traditional personal-income documentation.
Project review: the lender’s check of the building itself, done through a condo questionnaire and the association’s documents.
Expense ratio: the share of business deposits the lender treats as operating cost before counting the rest as income.
What Are the Two Reviews on One File?
Every file carries two independent gates, and a pass on one does nothing for the other. The income gate asks whether the borrower’s deposits support the loan. The building gate asks whether the project is a sound place to hold collateral.
Across the wholesale network, the building gate surprises borrowers most. A founder with clean deposits, strong credit and real reserves can still hit a wall because of something in the association’s books. Nothing in the borrower’s file caused it. The problem sits with the project, not with the borrower or the unit.
The label itself is also looser than people assume. Non-warrantable is industry shorthand, not a regulatory term. A Florida HOA practitioner explainer makes the same point: it simply means a conventional agency loan is not available. A separate explainer on non-warrantable condominiums adds that these buildings land in the category by failing standards, not by meeting a defined test.
That matters because lenders in the non-QM and portfolio space do not use the conventional box as their rulebook. They review the building on their own terms. Scotsman Guide notes that non-QM loans finance property types conforming lenders typically avoid, including condotels and non-warrantable condos. Appetite still varies from lender to lender, which is why one building can be a clean placement with one program and a decline with another.
The Triggers, One by One
The triggers are a short list, and most files that trip one trip it for a predictable reason. The table shows what a reviewer checks and why luxury buildings tend to hit each one. How a lender responds depends on its overlays, but the pattern below holds on most files.
| Trigger | What the lender checks | Why towers hit it | Typical response |
|---|---|---|---|
| Concentrated ownership | Units held by one owner or sponsor | Developer-held inventory in newer towers | Lower leverage or decline |
| Commercial space | Share of building used commercially | Retail podiums, restaurants, spa levels | Usually priced or capped |
| Litigation | Nature and exposure of the suit | Construction defect claims in newer buildings | Soft if minor, hard if structural |
| Reserves and repairs | Association funding, deferred work | Large systems, costly special assessments | Lower leverage, more review |
| Hotel or rental-pool use | Transient use, front desk, pool terms | Branded residences, resort components | Often a separate program |
| Insurance and dues | Master policy gaps, delinquent owners | High replacement cost, coastal exposure | Decline until fixed |
Litigation is the trigger people overstate. A lawsuit is not an automatic stop. The reviewer looks at what the dispute is about, how much money is at risk and whether insurance covers it. A suit over a contractor’s invoice reads very differently from a suit over structural or safety conditions. The second kind is where files die.
Think of the triggers as soft and hard. A soft trigger moves the file to a lower leverage cell or a heavier reserve ask. A hard trigger, such as an active structural claim or a master insurance gap, sends the file to another building or another program. The count matters too. A building showing one soft trigger is a different file from a building showing three.
Why Do Luxury Towers Trip More Triggers?
Luxury towers trip triggers more often because the features that make them luxury are the same features that raise project risk. No formal luxury category exists in condo eligibility. The label is about the building’s structure and finances, not its price.
Start with the podium. Many high-rises put retail, restaurants or a spa on the lower floors, and that commercial space counts against the project. Next, branded residences and hotel components bring front desks, rental programs and transient use into a building that otherwise looks residential.
Newer towers add developer-held inventory. Until the sponsor sells through, one owner holds a large block of units, which is the concentration trigger in plain form. Large buildings also carry large systems, so deferred repairs and special assessments can be big numbers even in a well-run association.
Then there is loan size. A luxury unit often needs a balance that pushes past the standard tiers. Through select wholesale programs, subject to full underwriting, the portfolio non-QM program carries files to $6,000,000, and the bank portfolio program carries twelve-month-statement files to $30,000,000 on its own ladder. A tall balance plus a building with one or two triggers produces a file that gets real scrutiny at both levels.
How Is Bank Statement Income Built?
A bank statement file turns deposits into a monthly income figure, then runs the usual credit, reserves and debt-to-income tests on top of it. The method is fully underwritten. It is not a light-documentation shortcut.
Through select wholesale programs, subject to full underwriting, the lender uses 12 or 24 consecutive months of personal or business statements. The bank portfolio program uses 12. Business statements need at least 25% ownership. The lender totals eligible deposits, applies an expense ratio and divides by the statement months.
The expense ratio is set from the business type, not picked by the borrower. Fixed ratios run 20% for a service business with no employees, 40% for one to five employees, and 50% for six or more employees or any product business. An accountant-provided ratio is another route, and a profit-and-loss method capped at 80% is a third. Transfers from the borrower’s own business into a personal account count in full. Statements must be consecutive, and a transaction history never substitutes for a statement.
Credit and ratios follow. The portfolio program has a 660 floor to the super-jumbo line and 700 above it. The bank portfolio program keeps a 680 floor at every size. Debt-to-income runs up to 50%. Reserves are 3 months to $500,000, 6 months to $1,500,000 and 9 months above, with 2 more months per additional financed property to a 12-month maximum, and first-time investors need 12.
Two asset-based paths exist for borrowers whose deposits do not tell the story. An asset allowance divides liquid assets by 36, 60 or 84 months, and an assets-only path qualifies when liquid assets cover the loan plus closing costs. Both apply to primary and second homes only.
Where Building and Income Collide
The two reviews meet in four places: leverage, dues, reserves and cash-out. Each one is where a building trigger changes what the borrower’s income can carry.
Leverage. Property type sets a ceiling on top of the size ladder. Warrantable condos run to 85%, and non-warrantable condos run to 80%. The condo ceiling is then lowered by the loan-size band and occupancy. A primary-residence purchase loan between $1,000,000 and $1,500,000 can reach 85% on the ladder, so the non-warrantable cap of 80% becomes the binding number. In the $3,000,000 to $3,500,000 band on a primary residence, the ladder itself sits at 75% on a purchase, and the ladder wins.
Credit matters inside each band. The score listed for a band is what the top leverage cell needs, not a program floor. A lower score takes a lower cell in the same band.
Dues. Association dues sit in the monthly obligation that feeds debt-to-income. A high-amenity tower with heavy dues eats into the 50% ceiling, which is why a file that clears on income alone can tighten once the building is priced in.
Reserves. Cash-out proceeds cannot satisfy reserves on files above the super-jumbo line. Those overlays start above $3,500,000 on a primary residence and above $3,000,000 on a second home or investment property.
Cash-out. Cash-out proceeds are unlimited at or below 60% LTV. Above 60% there is a $1,500,000 cash-in-hand cap on the portfolio program, and the bank portfolio program publishes no cap. Condotels carry their own ceilings of 75% on a purchase and 65% on a cash-out, dropping to 50% on a cash-out under the bank portfolio program. Leverage, reserves, and pricing vary by lender and program; the final terms follow the full file review.
Above $4,000,000, every figure is subject to review on a case-by-case basis before submission. That includes a non-warrantable building, which adds a second reason for a manual look.
Two Worked Scenarios
These are illustrations of how reviews run, not predictions for any file.
Scenario one: the podium tower. Picture a founder buying a primary residence in a tower with a large retail podium. Her deposits come from a service business with no employees, so the 20% expense ratio applies. The loan lands in the $2,000,000 to $2,500,000 band, where the best purchase cell is 80% and needs 720+ credit. The non-warrantable cap is also 80%, so the two limits agree.
The income review goes cleanly. The building review is where the file lives or dies. The reviewer sizes the commercial space against the whole project and checks whether the association’s reserves and insurance are in order. If the podium ratio is within the lender’s overlay, the file proceeds. If it is not, the same borrower may need a different building or a lower-leverage placement elsewhere in the network.
Scenario two: the pending lawsuit. Say an investor wants a second home in the $3,000,000 to $3,500,000 loan band, with the building named in a construction suit. That band sits under the portfolio program’s super-jumbo overlays. The best purchase cell is 65%, and it needs 760+ credit. A lower score takes a lower cell.
The reviewer asks what the suit alleges, how much is at risk and whether insurance responds. A contract dispute with coverage can be a soft trigger. A claim about structure or safety is the hard kind, and no deposit history changes that. For a luxury file above $4,000,000, the bank portfolio program takes over. The best primary-residence purchase cell is 65% there, on review, case by case before submission, and an active structural claim would likely end the file at that size too.
What Does the Agency Box Have to Do With It?
The agency box is the yardstick the label comes from, and nothing more. Fannie Mae’s Selling Guide section on ineligible projects lists the project characteristics that make a unit ineligible for purchase. They include hotel operations, split ownership, commercial space, litigation, single-entity ownership and critical repairs.
Agency-backed lenders cannot go beyond that box. Portfolio and non-QM programs can, so each reviews the same characteristics against its own overlays. For a reader trying to predict a file, that is the key point. The agency list tells you which triggers to look for, and the lender’s overlay tells you what each one costs.
Status also changes. If an association fixes the failing item, such as paying down delinquent dues or settling a suit, a lender can reclassify the building after a new review, as a governing documents explainer on non-warrantable condos describes. A building quoted as non-warrantable can come back warrantable, and that sometimes improves the leverage available.
Documents and Order of Operations
The order matters more than the pile. Request the building documents first, because they decide whether the borrower’s income review is worth running.
1. Condo questionnaire and HOA documents. Get these before the contract is signed. Associations often do not know their own status, and the questionnaire is how the lender finds out.
2. Budget, reserve study and master insurance. These show whether the building trips the reserves, repairs or insurance triggers.
3. Litigation disclosure and minutes. These show what a suit is about and whether it touches safety or structure.
4. Ownership and use data. Sponsor-held units, owner-occupancy mix, commercial space and any rental-pool terms all come from here.
5. Borrower statements. The 12 or 24 consecutive months of statements, business verification and any accountant letter.
6. Appraisal. The appraisal values the unit. It does not replace the project review. Thin in-building sales can make comparables harder, so value and eligibility are two separate questions.
Rental permission is a third question. Warrantability is a financing test, and the association’s documents set the rental rules. A warrantable building can still ban short stays. Short-term rental rules can vary by city, county, HOA and property type, so investors should confirm local rules before relying on projected rental income.
When Another Program Fits Better
A bank statement loan still builds a personal income figure from deposits. DSCR builds none. DSCR loans are designed for non-owner-occupied investment properties. Because they are business-purpose investor loans, they are reviewed differently from a standard owner-occupied mortgage. DSCR qualifies primarily on property-level rental income covering the payment, subject to lender guidelines.
For a rental in a non-warrantable building, the DSCR path can sidestep the income layer. The building review still applies. The complete DSCR loans guide covers the investor product itself.
| Factor | Bank statement | DSCR |
|---|---|---|
| Occupancy | Primary, second home, investment | Non-owner-occupied rental |
| Income test | Deposits after expense ratio | Property rent vs. payment |
| Building review | Yes | Yes |
| Best fit | Self-employed owner-occupant | Investor buying a rental |
An owner-occupied unit does not fit DSCR at all. A borrower living in the condo stays on the bank statement or asset paths. A condotel adds a separate layer, since the rental-pool arrangement has its own requirements, and a file can clear on coverage and still show thin cash flow once the operator takes its share.
Tax treatment varies; consult a qualified professional.
What If the Building Fails?
A failed building review is a redirect, not a dead end. Several options exist, and the right one depends on which trigger failed.
If the trigger is fixable, such as delinquent dues or a settled suit, wait for the association to resolve it and request a new review. If the trigger is structural, such as commercial space or sponsor concentration, another lender in the network may have a more flexible overlay. Appetite varies, and a second program sometimes accepts what the first declined.
Leverage is the usual price. Expect a lower cell, more reserves or both. Exit risk deserves a look too. A building that stays non-warrantable narrows the buyer pool at resale to cash and portfolio borrowers, which can pressure the sale price.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a bank statement loan be used on a non-warrantable condo?
Yes, through select wholesale programs, subject to full underwriting. The leverage ceiling on a non-warrantable condo purchase is 80%, and the loan-size ladder can lower it. The building is reviewed on its own, so a pass on income does not carry the file.
Does non-warrantable status reflect my credit or income?
No. It is a project-level test. Your credit and deposits are scored in a separate review, and neither can cure a building that fails.
Is a lawsuit against the association an automatic decline?
No. The reviewer weighs what the suit alleges, how much is at risk and whether insurance responds. Disputes over structure, safety or habitability are the ones that usually end a file.
How does loan size change the review?
Above $3,500,000 on a primary residence, and above $3,000,000 on a second home or investment property, super-jumbo overlays apply, including a 700 credit floor. Above $4,000,000, every figure is reviewed case by case before submission. Bands are measured on the loan amount, not the purchase price.
Is Lendmire a lender, and where can borrowers use these programs?
Lendmire is a broker that shops multiple wholesale programs and is not the lender. Consumer mortgage lending is licensed in 16 states: AL, CA, CO, FL, GA, IN, MI, MT, NM, NC, OH, PA, TN, TX, VA and WA. Nothing here is a commitment to lend.
Lendmire’s piece How to Qualify for a Bank Statement Loan for a Non-Warrantable Condo lays out the borrower-side checklist, and the building questionnaire is still the first document worth requesting on any luxury tower.
For current guidelines and terms, see Lendmire’s super jumbo bank statement loan programs page.
Lendmire’s self-employed mortgages page presents both super jumbo programs, bank statement and DSCR, side by side.
About Lendmire
Lendmire, NMLS# 2371349, is a mortgage brokerage with consumer lending licenses in 16 states. Bank statement, P&L-only, 1099-only and asset-based mortgages are arranged through wholesale lending partners for borrowers whose tax returns understate their income, and each application is reviewed individually by the lender. Scotsman Guide named Lendmire a Top Mortgage Workplace in both 2025 and 2026.
Get Started
Ready to find the right loan for you?
In about 30 seconds you can review financing options available for your home or investment property. No commitment required.
Informational only. Not a Loan Estimate, approval, or commitment to lend. Program availability and eligibility are subject to lender guidelines, credit approval, property review, and underwriting.
References
1. Mosaic HOA: Florida Condo Fannie Mae Blacklist
2. Homebuyer.com: Non-Warrantable Condominium
3. Scotsman Guide: One Out of 20 Mortgages Are Non-QM
4. Fannie Mae Selling Guide: Ineligible Projects
This article is part of Lendmire’s super jumbo bank statement loan program — full qualification details, guidelines, and scenarios live on the program page.
Related reading: How Super Jumbo Bank Statement Loan Reserves Work for a Venture-Backed Founder · How a Bank Statement Jumbo Loan Works in Vail · How a Luxury Home Bank Statement Loan Works in Washington
Brandon Miller
Founder & CEO, Mortgage Loan Originator, Lendmire LLC
- Mortgage Loan Originator · NMLS# 1129696 · Verify on NMLS Consumer Access
- North Carolina Real Estate Broker · License# 343312 · Verify on NCREC
- North Carolina Insurance Producer · License# 19053198 · Property, Casualty, Life, Health · Verify on NAIC SBS
- Lendmire LLC · Firm NMLS# 2371349 · Verify firm licensure
Important disclosures. Lendmire (NMLS# 2371349) is a licensed mortgage brokerage. Lendmire is not a direct lender, depository institution, or financial advisor. All loan inquiries are subject to lender underwriting; this article does not constitute a commitment to lend. Rates, terms, and program guidelines are subject to change without notice and vary by borrower profile, property type, and state. Information in this article is general in nature and is not financial, legal, or tax advice. Equal Housing Opportunity. NMLS Consumer Access: nmlsconsumeraccess.org.