The Quick Read: The asset qualifier path is for a retiree whose eligible balances cover the entire loan, because it documents no income at all. The asset depletion path is for a retiree whose balances are large but fall short of the loan amount, because it turns those balances into monthly income that has to pass a debt-to-income test. Pennsylvania does not change either path. The program figures below are the same for a borrower in Pittsburgh, Lancaster or the Philadelphia suburbs, subject to underwriting and select lender programs.
- Qualifier path: eligible assets must equal or exceed the whole loan, with no employment or income documented.
- Depletion path: usable assets divided by 60 months become qualifying income that must carry the housing payment and other debts.
- A borrower is qualified on one path at a time. The two never blend.
- Retirement accounts count differently on each path, and that difference often decides which one fits.
- Both paths document the assets in full. “No income documentation” never means “no documentation.”
Retirees ask this question because their statements look strong and their traditional personal-income documentation looks thin. A portfolio does not show up as wages. Lenders in Lendmire’s wholesale network handle that gap in two different ways, and picking the wrong one costs a borrower either leverage or loan size. This piece referees both. It is not a sales pitch for either one.
Lendmire is a broker. It arranges asset-based mortgages through select lenders in its network, and the lender’s own review governs every file. Consumer mortgage lending through Lendmire is licensed in 16 states, Pennsylvania among them.
Side-by-Side
The table shows the two paths as the network’s programs publish them, with each figure subject to underwriting.
| Factor | Asset Qualifier | Asset Depletion |
|---|---|---|
| Review basis | Eligible assets cover the entire loan | Assets become monthly income, then DTI |
| Income documented | None | Derived income only (can supplement real income) |
| Loan amounts | Up to $4,000,000 | $125,000 to $3,500,000 |
| Purchase leverage | Up to 80% | Up to 80% (residence, second home); 65% (investment) |
| Refinance leverage | Up to 75% | 80% rate-and-term, 60% cash-out (residence, second home); 65% / 60% (investment) |
| Property types | Principal residence, second home | Residence, second home, investment property |
| Retirement accounts | 90% under 59½, 100% at 59½+ | 70% at any age |
| Brokerage / securities | 100% | 80% |
| Seasoning | 60 days, two months of statements per account | Statements 120 days old plus one within 45 days |
| Credit | 600 minimum | The lender’s matrix |
| Reserves | None at or below 75% LTV | No published reserve months |
| Minimum assets | Must cover whole loan | Lesser of $1,000,000 or 1.25x the loan; $250,000 liquid floor if sole income |
Two things stand out. The qualifier path is more generous per dollar of balance, since brokerage, savings and money market all count at 100%. The depletion path is the only one of the two that reaches investment property, and it applies tighter leverage there.
What Each Path Actually Does
The qualifier path asks one question. After the credit percentages are applied, do the eligible assets equal or exceed the entire loan amount? If yes, no employment or income gets documented. The lender’s ability-to-repay review rests on the assets.
Here is the sanctioned shape. Take an $800,000 loan. The borrower holds $330,000 in brokerage accounts (100% counts, so $330,000), $300,000 in a 401(k) while under 59½ (90% counts, so $270,000), and $200,000 in savings (100% counts, so $200,000). That is $800,000 of usable assets, and the file is reviewed on assets alone. The lender’s own calculation governs.
The depletion path asks a different question. How much monthly income can the portfolio support? Eligible assets get their haircuts, then the total is divided by 60 months. Consider $1,500,000 in securities (80% counts, so $1,200,000) plus $300,000 in cash (100% counts, so $300,000). That is $1,500,000 usable. Divided by 60 months, it produces $25,000 of monthly qualifying income. That figure then carries the housing payment and other debts through the debt-to-income test.
The assets stay invested on both paths. Nobody liquidates anything to qualify. The balances are documented, and the lender uses them for the calculation.
When Asset Qualifier Is the Better Fit
The qualifier path wins when the retiree has more eligible money than the loan needs. That sounds narrow, but it describes a common Pennsylvania situation: a couple sells a long-held home in the suburbs, keeps a large cash and brokerage position, and wants to buy a smaller place or a second home with a sizable loan on top.
Four reasons to lean this way:
- No debt-to-income test. A retiree with a pension, Social Security and a few monthly obligations still does not have to prove ratios. The file never computes them on this path.
- Better credit for the same balance. A retiree under 59½ with a large IRA sees 90% credit on the qualifier path versus 70% on the depletion path. After 59½, it is 100% versus 70%. On a retirement-heavy portfolio, that gap is the whole decision.
- Higher loan ceiling. The path runs to $4,000,000, while the depletion path stops at $3,500,000.
- Lower credit floor. The published minimum is 600. That helps a retiree who has not carried much debt and whose score reflects it.
The cost is plain. The eligible assets have to cover the whole loan, not just a down payment. A retiree who wants a $900,000 loan needs $900,000 in countable assets. For many portfolio-heavy households that is reachable. For a retiree with $1,200,000 in total assets and a $1,000,000 loan in mind, it may not be, because some of that money sits in accounts that do not count at 100%.
Seasoning matters here too. The path wants 60 days of seasoning and two months of statements for each qualifying account. A retiree who just moved money between institutions should plan around that before applying. Accounts combine, but each one needs its own statements.
Reserves are a minor issue on this path. None are required at or below 75% loan-to-value. Above that, the lender sets them.
When Asset Depletion Is the Better Fit
Depletion fits the retiree whose assets are large but do not cover the loan outright. It also fits the borrower buying an investment property, since that is the only path of the two that reaches one.
The cases where it earns its place:
- The loan is larger than the usable assets. Income gets built from the portfolio and carries the payment, so the balances do not have to equal the loan.
- The retiree has real income too. Asset-derived income may supplement Social Security, a pension or an annuity, up to a 45% debt-to-income ratio. When it supplements, the minimum-assets rule is waived. A retiree with a modest pension and a mid-sized portfolio can stack the two.
- The target is an investment property. The depletion path allows up to 65% on a purchase or rate-and-term refinance, and 60% on cash-out. Those ceilings are lower than the residence figures, and the lender prices that risk into the file.
- Cash-out on a residence or second home. The path allows 60%. Cash-out proceeds never count as qualifying assets, so a retiree cannot borrow the money and then use it to qualify.
The costs are real. Haircuts shrink the pool: cash and CDs count at 100%, securities at 80%, private stock at 75%, retirement accounts at 70%, and real-estate equity at 60%. The minimum is the lesser of $1,000,000 or 1.25 times the loan, and never below $250,000 liquid when depletion is the only income. A first-time investor on this path needs a 700 score. A housing event needs four years of seasoning.
Statement age works against sloppy planning. The lender wants statements at least 120 days old at application, plus the most recent one within 45 days. Funds from the sale of a business, an inheritance or a legal settlement are excused from that seasoning, which helps a retiree who just received a lump sum.
Here’s the catch on shrinking assets. Funds used for the down payment and closing costs come out of the pool first, so buying more property uses up asset eligibility. A retiree planning two purchases needs to run the numbers for the second one separately.
Which Assets Count, and Which Don’t
Both paths treat assets as documented, not assumed. Some classes never count at a percentage on either path.
Not published as eligible: cryptocurrency, precious metals, collectibles, business accounts beyond the borrower’s ownership share, and pledged or borrowed funds. The documented route is converting them to a seasoned cash balance in a regulated account, with the lender reviewing the source. Don’t present them as counting at some percentage.
The depletion path also excludes custodial accounts, deferred compensation, escrow accounts, foreign funds, cash on hand, stock options, non-vested restricted stock units and funds from non-regulated financial companies.
One more point for retirees. Roth accounts, trust-held assets and joint accounts get reviewed by the lender case by case. Bring the account titling and the beneficiary paperwork so there is no surprise at the document stage.
Does Pennsylvania Change Anything?
Not the program. The figures above do not move by state. What Pennsylvania changes is the borrower’s context: local property values, county-level taxes and insurance that feed the housing payment on the depletion path, and the pull of downsizing out of a larger home. Those affect how much house the numbers support. They do not change the leverage, the haircuts or the seasoning.
The state’s treatment of retirement income is a separate question. Secondary tax sources say Pennsylvania generally does not tax Social Security or qualifying retirement-plan distributions taken after retirement age, as a Pennsylvania retirement tax guide explains. Those are tax points, not underwriting rules. Tax treatment varies; consult a qualified professional.
Rental Property and the Business-Purpose Line
A retiree buying a rental should know that financing for a non-owner-occupied rental is generally treated as business-purpose credit. The CFPB’s Regulation Z § 1026.3 exempts credit extended primarily for business purposes, and its commentary treats acquiring a non-owner-occupied rental as business purpose when the owner does not expect to occupy it more than 14 days in the coming year. The Federal Reserve’s copy of the staff commentary carries the occupancy test.
That is why rental financing usually moves to a DSCR loan, which qualifies primarily on property-level rental income covering the payment, subject to lender guidelines. Lendmire’s complete DSCR loans guide covers how that works. The asset depletion path above is the consumer-purpose route that can still reach an investment property when a retiree wants to qualify on the portfolio instead of on the rent.
Reading the Two Together
Run a retiree through both and the answer usually sorts itself.
Picture a 66-year-old couple with $900,000 in brokerage and savings and $400,000 in IRAs, shopping for a $1,000,000 loan on a second home. On the qualifier path, the cash side counts at 100% and the IRAs at 100% since they are past 59½. That is $1,300,000 of usable assets against a $1,000,000 loan. Qualifier fits.
Now picture a 58-year-old with $1,100,000 mostly in a 401(k) and a taxable account, wanting a $1,000,000 loan. Retirement credit on the qualifier path is 90% under 59½, which may leave the usable total below the loan. Depletion is the likelier route, though the 70% retirement haircut and the debt-to-income test will limit how large the loan can be.
Honestly, some borrowers run both and find neither clears. That is a legitimate result. A larger down payment, a smaller loan or a different program may fit better, and the brokerage can compare the options against the actual statements.
Where Files Stall
Most delays come from preventable gaps, not from the program.
- Stale statements. Depletion needs statements at least 120 days old plus one within 45 days. Pull them before applying.
- Unseasoned transfers. Moving money between accounts resets the clock on the qualifier path’s 60 days.
- Ineligible assets in the total. Crypto, stock options and unvested RSUs get counted by the borrower and dropped by the lender.
- Assuming the haircut table is one table. The qualifier and depletion percentages differ. Blending them produces a number a lender is unlikely to use.
- Forgetting the loan includes everything. The qualifier path needs assets to cover the entire loan, not the equity gap.
Balanced Verdict
Choose the qualifier path when countable assets, after the credit percentages, already equal the loan and the target is a residence or second home. It is simpler, it pays more per retirement dollar, and it skips the debt-to-income test.
Choose the depletion path when assets are strong but short of the loan, when real income needs to be stacked with the portfolio, or when the property is an investment property. It costs more in haircuts and adds a ratio test, but it reaches borrowers the qualifier path cannot.
Neither is better in the abstract. The statements decide.
If you are qualifying on assets rather than income and want to see how the numbers work, Lendmire can help you compare asset-based mortgage options based on your statements, the property, credit profile, leverage, and your goals. Reach the team at 828-256-2183 or through the quote request page.
Frequently Asked Questions
Are asset qualifier and asset depletion the same thing?
Not on the network’s programs. The qualifier path needs assets to cover the whole loan and documents no income. The depletion path converts assets to monthly income and runs a debt-to-income test. Market usage is loose, so ask any loan officer whether a debt ratio gets computed.
Do I have to sell my investments to qualify?
No. The assets stay invested on both paths. Lenders document the balances and use them in a calculation. Nothing is liquidated unless you choose to use funds for the down payment or closing costs.
Do retirement accounts count?
Yes, with different credit on each path. The qualifier path counts 401(k) and IRA balances at 90% under 59½ and 100% at 59½ or older. The depletion path counts retirement accounts at 70% at any age. Eligibility is subject to underwriting.
Can I combine Social Security or a pension with asset income?
On the depletion path, yes. Asset-derived income can supplement documented income up to a 45% debt-to-income ratio, and the minimum-assets rule is waived when it supplements. The qualifier path documents no income, so it has nothing to combine.
Does either path work for a rental property?
Only the depletion path reaches investment property, at up to 65% on a purchase or rate-and-term refinance and 60% on cash-out. A pure rental purchase often fits a DSCR loan better, since that qualifies primarily on property-level rental income, subject to lender guidelines.
Lendmire’s asset-based mortgage in Pennsylvania page presents the program for Pennsylvania borrowers.
About Lendmire
Lendmire (NMLS# 2371349) is a mortgage brokerage serving self-employed and high-net-worth borrowers in 16 states. Bank statement, P&L-only, 1099-only and asset-based mortgages are arranged through wholesale lending channels; Lendmire brokers the financing and the lender underwrites each application. Scotsman Guide named Lendmire a Top Mortgage Workplace in both 2025 and 2026.
Get Started
Ready to find the right loan for you?
In about 30 seconds you can review financing options available for your home or investment property. No commitment required.
Informational only. Not a Loan Estimate, approval, or commitment to lend. Program availability and eligibility are subject to lender guidelines, credit approval, property review, and underwriting.
References
1. Taxstra — Pennsylvania Retirement Taxes
2. CFPB Regulation Z § 1026.3 — Exemptions
3. Federal Reserve — CFPB Official Staff Commentary on Regulation Z
This article is part of Lendmire’s asset-based mortgage program — full qualification details, guidelines, and scenarios live on the program page.
Related reading: How to Meet Jumbo Loan Asset Depletion Requirements for an Asset-Rich Retiree · How an Asset Depletion Mortgage Works · Asset Depletion vs Bank Statement HELOC for a Retiree
Guides: Asset-Based Mortgage in Pennsylvania
Brandon Miller
Founder & CEO, Mortgage Loan Originator, Lendmire LLC
- Mortgage Loan Originator · NMLS# 1129696 · Verify on NMLS Consumer Access
- North Carolina Real Estate Broker · License# 343312 · Verify on NCREC
- North Carolina Insurance Producer · License# 19053198 · Property, Casualty, Life, Health · Verify on NAIC SBS
- Lendmire LLC · Firm NMLS# 2371349 · Verify firm licensure
Legal disclosures. Lendmire (NMLS# 2371349) is a state-licensed mortgage brokerage that arranges financing through wholesale lender relationships. Lendmire is not a direct lender, depository institution, or registered financial advisor. The discussion above is general informational content about real estate financing — it is not financial, legal, or tax advice, and readers should consult licensed professionals for guidance on their individual circumstances. Loan inquiries are subject to lender underwriting; this article does not represent a commitment to lend. Loan terms, rates, and qualification standards vary by borrower, property, and state, and are subject to change at any time. Equal Housing Opportunity. NMLS Consumer Access: nmlsconsumeraccess.org.